2026 Edition 8 Chapters Checklists + Templates ~45 min read

The Complete Guide to Remote Depositions in 2026

Everything a litigator or paralegal needs to run remote depositions efficiently — exhibit management, technology setup, court reporter coordination, and avoiding the mistakes that derail proceedings.

This guide is for litigators and paralegals who run depositions. It is not theory. Every section is actionable. If you only read one chapter, read Chapter 3 on exhibits — it's where most remote depositions break down.

About This Guide

Remote depositions are no longer exceptional. More than 70% of law firms now conduct at least some depositions remotely, a figure that has held steady since 2023 and is projected to continue growing. What has changed is the expectation: remote is no longer treated as a fallback for unusual circumstances. It is a workflow choice — one that, done well, saves significant time and money, and done poorly, creates real risk.

This guide distills what we have learned from more than 50,000 proceedings run on the AgileLaw platform, combined with current court rules, bar guidance, and input from litigators across AmLaw 100 firms. It covers the full arc of a remote deposition: the rules that govern it, the technology you actually need, exhibit management (the biggest source of friction by a wide margin), court reporter coordination, security, and the day-of checklist.

Table of Contents
01 The State of Remote Depositions in 2026 Free
02 Technology Setup: What You Actually Need Unlock
03 Exhibit Management: The Biggest Source of Friction Unlock
04 Working with Court Reporters Remotely Unlock
05 Common Technical Problems and How to Prevent Them Unlock
06 Security and Confidentiality in Remote Proceedings Unlock
07 The Remote Deposition Day-Of Checklist Unlock
08 What Great Remote Depositions Look Like Unlock
A–C Stipulation Template + Witness Prep Sheet + Tech Checklist Unlock
Chapter 01

The State of Remote Depositions in 2026

From Emergency Measure to Standard Practice

When courts shut down in March 2020, litigators conducted their first remote depositions out of necessity. Most expected to return to in-person proceedings as soon as restrictions lifted. That is not what happened.

By 2022, surveys showed that a majority of attorneys who had conducted remote depositions planned to continue — not because they had to, but because they preferred it. By 2024, 47.8% of firms reported their remote deposition usage would stay the same or increase. In 2025, remote depositions had become a standard workflow option at virtually every significant litigation practice in the country.

The reasons are practical, not philosophical:

  • Cost. Travel costs for multi-day out-of-state depositions routinely run into thousands of dollars per attorney, per deposition. Remote eliminates most of that.
  • Scheduling. Getting four attorneys, a court reporter, and a witness in the same room on the same day is a logistics problem. Remote depositions reduce scheduling friction significantly.
  • Witness access. Remote makes it easier to depose witnesses in other states or countries who would otherwise require a commission or letters rogatory.
  • Record quality. Properly run remote depositions produce better video records than many in-person depositions — consistent framing, no crowd noise, cleaner audio.

What courts, opposing counsel, and clients have all adjusted to is not the concept of remote depositions — they accept that. What they have not adjusted to is poor execution. The litigator who fumbles with exhibits, loses participants to dropped connections, and produces a garbled transcript is still common. This guide is about not being that litigator.

The Legal Framework: Where We Stand in 2026

Federal Courts: FRCP Rule 30(b)(4)

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), parties may stipulate — or the court may on motion order — that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote means. The rule specifies that for purposes of FRCP Rule 28 (officer requirements) and Rules 37(a)(2) and 37(b)(1), the deposition takes place where the deponent answers the questions.

Key implications of Rule 30(b)(4):

  1. Stipulation is the preferred path. The cleanest way to conduct a remote deposition in federal court is by written stipulation with opposing counsel. Most courts expect this. Get it in writing before the deposition, not on the record the day of.
  2. Court order as alternative. If opposing counsel will not stipulate, you can move for a court order. Courts have been generally receptive, particularly when in-person attendance would impose undue burden or expense.
  3. The deposition takes place where the witness is. This matters for the oath. Under Rule 28, the officer administering the oath must be authorized to act in the jurisdiction where the deposition takes place — where the witness is located, not where you are.
  4. Recording method must be stated in the notice. The party noticing the deposition must specify whether testimony will be recorded by audio, audiovisual, or stenographic means. If you want video, it must be in the notice.

State Courts

State rules vary more than federal rules, and the variation matters. A few important benchmarks:

California

CRC 3.1010 expressly permits oral depositions by telephone, videoconference, or other remote electronic means. Notice served with the notice of deposition is sufficient; no court order is needed.

Florida

Permanently codified remote depositions following pandemic-era emergency orders. The party noticing a remote deposition must state it in the title of the notice and provide access instructions in the body.

Massachusetts

Effective February 1, 2025, amended Rule 30(b)(4) to authorize depositions by videoconference without requiring a stipulation or court order. Includes specific provisions on technology, exhibits, and participant identification.

New York (SDNY)

Published a Sample Protocol for Remote Depositions (revised December 2023) that many practitioners use as a template for stipulations. Covers platform selection, exhibit procedures, objections, and technical problem protocols.

The general trend across all states is toward permanent authorization of remote depositions, either by rule or standing order, with an expectation of advance notice and written protocol.

The ABA's Role: Resolution 505

In February 2023, the ABA House of Delegates adopted Resolution 505, establishing best practices for remote depositions. This is not binding law, but it represents the profession's consensus on what competent practice looks like. Courts have begun referencing it.

Resolution 505 establishes that attorneys conducting remote depositions should:

  • Confirm the platform and technical requirements with all parties in advance
  • Establish ground rules for objections, interruptions, and technical problems
  • Coordinate exhibit procedures in writing before the deposition
  • Ensure the court reporter has all necessary information and access
  • Take steps to prevent unauthorized recording or distribution of testimony
  • Confirm identity of all participants before the record opens

The shift from ad hoc emergency orders to a formal ABA resolution signals where the profession is: remote depositions are now standard practice with professional obligations attached, not an improvised response to unusual circumstances.

What Courts Expect in 2026

Judges in 2026 have presided over enough disputed remote depositions to know what problems look like. They are generally unsympathetic to technical failures that adequate preparation would have prevented.

Technology competence as a professional obligation. ABA Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8 identifies technology as part of the duty of competence. An attorney who shows up to a remote deposition without having tested their connection, exhibits, or platform is arguably falling short of this standard.

Courts additionally expect: stipulation in advance on platform and exhibit procedure; clean exhibit handling with a court reporter-maintained exhibit log; and identity verification of the deponent on the record before examination begins.

The Business Case for Remote

$3K–$8K
Typical travel cost per out-of-state deposition (flights, hotel, meals)
60%
Average reduction in exhibit prep time when using a dedicated exhibit platform vs. screen share
2–4 wks
Scheduling delay that remote depositions typically eliminate vs. in-person coordination

None of this means every deposition should be remote. High-stakes witness credibility assessments, complex multi-party proceedings where reading the room matters, or witnesses who are not technology-capable are all cases where in-person may be the right call. For the large majority of depositions, remote is not the compromise option. It is the better option when done properly.

Chapter 02

Technology Setup: What You Actually Need

The Three Tiers of Technology

Most guides to remote deposition technology err in one of two directions: they either recommend a consumer setup that will buckle under the demands of a long deposition, or they recommend an enterprise configuration that no attorney actually uses. This chapter takes a different approach — distinguishing between what you need to conduct a competent deposition, what experienced practitioners actually use, and what is optional.

The foundation is your internet connection. Everything else depends on it. For remote deposition platforms, you need at minimum 10 Mbps download and 5 Mbps upload — but the real target is 25/10 Mbps, which gives you headroom for exhibit sharing, video recording, and competing network traffic. A wired Ethernet connection is materially more reliable than Wi-Fi and should be your default whenever possible.

Continue reading — it's free

Enter your work email to unlock Chapters 2–8, the day-of checklist, the stipulation template, and the witness tech prep sheet.

Technology setup (exact specs) Exhibit management mechanics Court reporter coordination Day-of checklist (printable) Stipulation template Witness prep sheet

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Takes 10 seconds.

Wired vs. Wi-Fi

Use a wired Ethernet connection wherever possible. Wi-Fi has three failure modes wired connections do not: interference from neighboring networks, congestion from other devices on your network, and physical obstacles between your device and the router.

If you must use Wi-Fi (and many attorneys conducting depositions from hotel rooms or client offices do), position yourself as close to the router as possible and ask that other users avoid bandwidth-heavy activities during the deposition.

Practical tip: Carry an Ethernet cable and a USB-to-Ethernet adapter. Most modern laptops lack a built-in Ethernet port. A $15 adapter and $10 cable eliminate one of the most common failure modes in remote depositions.

Computer Hardware

Use a dedicated laptop or desktop no more than 3–4 years old. A deposition that runs 6 hours with continuous video, exhibit sharing, and document review is a demanding workload. Older machines heat up, throttle their processors, and produce audio/video artifacts. Minimum: 8 GB RAM, quad-core processor. Recommended: 16 GB RAM.

Close unnecessary applications. Before the deposition begins, close every application you are not actively using: browser tabs, email clients, cloud sync applications, automatic updaters. This single step prevents a significant percentage of mid-deposition performance problems.

Disable automatic updates. Windows and macOS updates have interrupted more remote depositions than almost any other single cause. Check for updates the night before. Disable automatic installation on deposition day.

Audio Equipment

Audio is more important than video. A court reporter who cannot clearly hear testimony cannot produce an accurate transcript. Your laptop's built-in microphone picks up keyboard noise, fan noise, and ambient room sound. It is designed for casual calls, not legal proceedings. Do not rely on it for depositions.

Option
Quality
Cost
Best For
USB headset (boom mic)
Good
$60–$150
Most attorneys — blocks external noise, mic at mouth
USB desktop mic
Best
$100–$200
Long depositions, fixed desk setup
Bluetooth headset
Poor
Avoid — latency and dropout
Laptop built-in
Poor
Avoid — keyboard/fan noise

For witnesses: Advise witnesses on audio setup in your pre-deposition tech check. Many will attempt to use earbuds or their laptop microphone. Provide a one-page tech prep document (see Appendix B) at least 48 hours before the deposition.

Video / Webcam

Your laptop's built-in webcam is acceptable if it is 1080p and you have good lighting. A standalone USB webcam (Logitech C920 or better, ~$80) provides better image quality and flexible positioning. Position it at eye level — not below, which creates an unflattering low-angle shot for witnesses.

Lighting is the overlooked variable. A $30 ring light or desk lamp positioned behind your monitor and pointed at your face eliminates the most common video problem: appearing dark and hard to read. For witnesses, poor lighting (window behind them) is worth flagging in your prep session.

The Video Conferencing Platform

Most remote depositions in 2025–2026 use Zoom (most widely adopted), Microsoft Teams, or Webex. Important: the video conferencing platform is not your exhibit platform. Zoom's screen share feature is routinely misused as an exhibit management tool. It is not adequate for this purpose — Chapter 3 covers this in depth.

For the video platform, always enable the waiting room, confirm who hosts (typically the noticing party), and coordinate recording settings with the court reporter. The reporter should have co-host access to manage participants and recording.

Minimum Viable Pre-Deposition Tech Checklist
Internet speed tested: ≥10 Mbps download, ≥5 Mbps upload
Wired Ethernet confirmed (or best available Wi-Fi)
Video platform updated to latest version
Exhibit platform loaded and exhibits uploaded
Audio tested with headset — no laptop mic
Camera tested — framing, lighting, background
Automatic updates disabled for deposition day
Backup internet connection ready (cellular hotspot)
Witness completed tech check
Court reporter has platform link and co-host access
Chapter 03

Exhibit Management: The Biggest Source of Friction

Why This Chapter Exists

If you ask litigators who run remote depositions what goes wrong most often, the answer is almost never "the internet connection dropped" or "the camera failed." It is almost always something about exhibits. Exhibits are where remote depositions break down — where opposing counsel objects, where the transcript becomes ambiguous, where witnesses lose their place, and where what should be a crisp examination becomes a halting, frustrating slog.

The Screen Share Problem

The most common approach to exhibit management in remote depositions is also the worst one: screen sharing a PDF in Zoom and scrolling through it while the witness watches. Here is everything wrong with this approach:

1
The witness is not looking at a document — they are watching you look at a document. When you share your screen and scroll through Exhibit 12, the witness sees whatever you see. If you scroll to the wrong page, the witness follows. They have no independent access to the document.
2
The record is ambiguous. When you say "directing your attention to the paragraph beginning 'pursuant to the agreement,'" what exactly are the court reporter and future readers of the transcript looking at? With a screen share, the record depends entirely on the examining attorney's navigation.
3
It cannot be marked. A screen share is not an exhibit. An exhibit is a document that is introduced, marked, identified on the record, and preserved. A screen share with no formal identification has a chain of custody problem and will be challenged.
4
It creates cross-talk and delays. "Can you see that?" "Which page are you on?" "Can you scroll down a little?" This is not examination. It is logistics. It wastes time, breaks the witness's concentration, and produces transcripts full of procedural noise.

What Proper Remote Exhibit Management Looks Like

Proper remote exhibit management replicates what happens in an in-person deposition room: every participant has access to the same document, at the same time, and that document is formally identified and logged.

  1. All exhibits are uploaded to the exhibit platform before the deposition begins — pre-marked (or the platform marks them at introduction).
  2. The examining attorney introduces an exhibit in the platform, pushing it to every participant simultaneously — witness, opposing counsel, court reporter. Everyone sees the same document at the same time.
  3. The court reporter logs the introduction: exhibit number, description, and timestamp. This creates an unambiguous record.
  4. The witness accesses the document in their own viewer and can scroll and zoom independently. No more "can you scroll down?"
  5. At the end of the deposition, the exhibit log is exported and becomes part of the record.

Preparing Your Exhibit Set

The quality of your remote deposition is largely determined by the quality of your pre-deposition exhibit preparation. This is work done in advance, not under the pressure of examination.

  • Single-document PDFs. Each exhibit should be a separate PDF — not a multi-document combined PDF. This allows platform introduction one at a time.
  • Name logically. Use a naming convention: Ex001_Smith_Email_2022-03-15.pdf, not document(3)_final_FINAL.pdf.
  • Searchable text. Use PDFs with searchable text, not scanned images. Text-based PDFs are faster to navigate and allow keyword search under time pressure.
  • Leave gaps in numbering for documents you may introduce out of sequence (e.g., skip to every 10th number).
  • Flag sensitive documents — AEO, sealed material — and use your platform's access controls to restrict who can view them.

The Exhibit Log

At the close of the deposition, take five minutes to reconcile the exhibit log with the reporter. Go through each exhibit number, confirm the description matches, note any exhibits marked but not used, and confirm any objections. A discrepancy caught here takes five minutes to resolve. A discrepancy discovered during trial prep takes much longer and may require reopening the deposition.

Chapter 04

Working with Court Reporters Remotely

The Oath in Remote Depositions

Under FRCP Rule 28, the officer administering the oath must be authorized to act in the jurisdiction where the deposition takes place — which, in a remote deposition, is where the witness is located, not where the examining attorney is. This creates a multi-state oath question that must be addressed before the deposition begins.

How this gets resolved in practice: Most court reporting agencies are notarially commissioned in multiple states or have affiliates who can serve as officer of record where the witness is located. When you book a remote deposition, confirm with the agency that the oath question has been addressed for your witness's state. Alternatively, include a stipulation waiving the officer requirement or accepting a specific arrangement — this is the cleanest solution.

On the record, the reporter must state: their name and business address; the date, time, and place of the deposition (where the witness is); the deponent's name; the recording method; the oath; and the identity of all participants present. Do not allow examination to begin before this statement is complete.

What to Coordinate 48 Hours Before

Call or email your reporter — or the agency — at least 48 hours before the deposition. Cover these five points:

  1. Platform and access. Send the meeting link. Request co-host access so the reporter can manage muting, participants, and recording.
  2. Exhibit procedure. Walk the reporter through how you will be introducing exhibits and how they should log them. Confirm the numbering convention.
  3. Audio setup. Ask whether they prefer all non-speaking participants muted. Confirm they have a headset.
  4. Oath logistics. Confirm the reporter is authorized to administer the oath in the witness's location.
  5. Technical problem protocol. Agree on what happens if the connection drops. Standard: stay on record, note the problem and time, all parties reconnect within 10–15 minutes before proceeding.

During Examination

  • Speak clearly and deliberately. Remote audio occasionally degrades — give the reporter time to catch up by pausing between questions and answers.
  • Prevent cross-talk. Instruct the witness to wait for a complete question before answering. The reporter cannot transcribe simultaneous speech.
  • Read exhibit introductions aloud fully: "I am introducing what I am marking as Exhibit 14, an email dated March 15, 2022, from John Smith to Jane Doe, Bates numbers XYZ-0001 through XYZ-0003."
  • Call breaks every ~90 minutes and state the off-record/on-record times clearly.
Chapter 05

Common Technical Problems and How to Prevent Them

Technical failures in remote depositions cluster into a predictable set. Most are preventable. All are less disruptive if you have a plan for them in advance.

01 Connection drops mid-deposition

Why it happens: Network congestion, Wi-Fi interference, or — very commonly — a device running an automatic update.

Prevention: Wired Ethernet, automatic updates disabled, cellular hotspot ready as backup.

Recovery plan: Agree in advance that all parties will attempt to reconnect within 10 minutes. No examination proceeds until the relevant party is back on the record.

02 Poor audio / transcript inaccuracies

Why it happens: Built-in laptop microphones, background noise, Bluetooth audio with latency.

Prevention: External USB headset for examining attorney; specific audio guidance for witness at tech check; mute all non-speaking participants.

Recovery plan: Go off the record and troubleshoot before continuing. Do not continue examination through audio the reporter cannot clearly transcribe.

03 Exhibit introduction confusion

Why it happens: Using screen share instead of a dedicated exhibit platform; no coordination with the reporter on numbering.

Prevention: Use a dedicated exhibit platform. Pre-upload all anticipated exhibits. State every introduction on the record with description and Bates range.

04 Witness using an inadequate device or setup

Why it happens: No pre-deposition tech prep; witness assumes any device will work.

Prevention: Send a tech prep document (Appendix B) 48 hours before. Conduct a tech check with the witness 24 hours before.

Recovery plan: If the setup is clearly inadequate at the start, request a brief delay to address it before the record opens.

05 Uninvited or uncontrolled participants

Prevention: Always enable the waiting room. Admit participants individually, confirming identity before they enter. Do not open the record until all present are confirmed.

06 Automatic update mid-deposition

Prevention: Check for and install updates the night before. Disable automatic installation on deposition day (and re-enable afterward). Include this step in your witness tech prep document.

07 Echo or feedback

Why it happens: A participant using speakers and microphone simultaneously — the mic picks up the audio output.

Prevention: All participants use headsets or earbuds. If someone is using laptop speakers, ask them to switch to headphones.

08 Witness in an unsuitable location

Prevention: Explicitly state in your tech prep that the witness must be in a private, quiet room where they cannot be overheard. Confirm the location during the tech check.

09 Recording failures

Prevention: Confirm recording settings before the deposition. Use both local and cloud recording if possible. Assign the reporter or a paralegal co-host to monitor recording status throughout.

10 Objection and interruption chaos

Prevention: State the objection protocol at the opening: "Counsel will state objections as 'Objection, [basis].' The witness will wait until instructed to answer or not answer." Slow down — remote communication benefits from a deliberately slower pace than in-person.

Chapter 06

Security and Confidentiality in Remote Proceedings

Why Security Is a Professional Obligation

Remote depositions transmit confidential testimony, sensitive documents, and privileged attorney communications over internet infrastructure. ABA Model Rule 1.6(c) requires lawyers to make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of client information. ABA Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8 identifies technology competence as part of the duty of competence. Together, these rules create a professional obligation to understand the security characteristics of any platform you use.

Platform Security Minimums

  • End-to-end encryption for meeting content in transit and at rest. Enterprise-tier accounts (Zoom Business, Teams, Webex) provide this. Free or consumer-tier accounts may not.
  • Waiting room and access controls — ability to remove participants, require admission.
  • No third-party data sharing — review the platform's privacy policy. Some free platforms permit using meeting data for product improvement. Not appropriate for legal proceedings.
  • SOC 2 Type II certification — means security controls have been independently audited. The baseline standard for enterprise software handling sensitive information.

Exhibit Security

Every document you introduce in a remote deposition is transmitted over the internet to multiple participants. Emailing PDFs to all participants as exhibits are introduced does not meet professional security standards — it creates multiple unencrypted copies with no access logging and no ability to revoke access.

A proper exhibit platform provides: encrypted storage and transmission; role-based access controls; access logging (who viewed or downloaded each document, with timestamps); expiring access links; and no public or unauthenticated access.

Witness Environment Security

Unauthorized observers. Anyone in the witness's physical location can see and hear the deposition even if not visible on camera. Instruct witnesses to be in a private room with the door closed, and ask them to confirm at the start of the deposition that no one else is present.

Recording by the witness is prohibited unless your stipulation or court order permits it. Include this prohibition in your written ground rules and state it on the record at the opening.

AEO and confidential documents: If your exhibit set includes documents subject to a protective order — particularly Attorneys' Eyes Only — you cannot introduce those documents to a session that includes the opposing party's client representative. Use your exhibit platform's participant-level access controls to restrict AEO documents to counsel only.

Chapter 07

The Remote Deposition Day-Of Checklist

Print this page and use it before every remote deposition. Run it yourself or assign it to a paralegal co-host.

T-Minus 30 Minutes: Connection & Hardware
Connect Ethernet cable (or confirm best available Wi-Fi)
Run speed test — ≥10 Mbps down, ≥5 Mbps up
Close all unnecessary applications and browser tabs
Disable automatic updates / confirm already done
Plug in power adapter — do not run on battery
External microphone/headset connected and set as default audio
Camera framing confirmed — eye level, good lighting, neutral background
T-Minus 30 Minutes: Platform & Exhibits
Open video conferencing platform — waiting room enabled
Recording configured and tested
Open exhibit platform — all exhibits loaded, named, organized
Co-host link sent to court reporter
Your own copies of all exhibits accessible and bookmarked
Exhibit list ready to mark off as you go
T-Minus 15 Minutes: Admits
Admit court reporter — confirm co-host access
Brief verbal check with reporter: exhibit numbering, objection protocol, tech problem protocol
Admit opposing counsel
Confirm all required participants present before admitting witness
T-Minus 5 Minutes: Witness Admission
Admit witness to the meeting
Confirm witness can be seen and heard clearly
Confirm no one else is present with the witness
Confirm witness is not recording
Confirm witness can access exhibits
Opening the Record
Reporter states: name, date/time/place, deponent's name, recording method, all participants
Attorney states: platform, exhibit procedure, objection protocol, any confidentiality designations
Witness administered oath
During Examination
State exhibit introductions fully on the record (number, description, Bates range)
Confirm witness can see each exhibit as introduced
Pause after each question — allow answer to complete
Call breaks every ~90 minutes; state off-record/on-record times
Closing the Record & Post-Deposition
Reconcile exhibit log with reporter — confirm all exhibits numbered correctly
Confirm video record preserved and by whom
Export exhibit log from platform — save to case file
Brief paralegal on exhibits to organize with transcript
Chapter 08

What Great Remote Depositions Look Like

The Gap Between Adequate and Good

Most remote depositions in 2026 are adequate. The technology works well enough, the transcript gets produced, and no one gets sanctioned. But adequate and good are not the same thing. The difference matters in cases where the deposition record will be used at trial, in summary judgment briefing, or in arbitration.

They Treat Setup as Part of Preparation

Litigators who run remote depositions well treat the technical setup with the same seriousness as the substantive preparation. They don't delegate exhibit upload to someone who doesn't know the platform. They run the tech check themselves, or they have a paralegal who knows the platform inside and out handle it.

When exhibit introduction is fluent — the attorney introduces the document, it appears instantly for the witness, the reporter logs it without prompting — examination has a rhythm. The witness's attention is on the question, not on navigation. The record is clean.

They Have a Protocol for Everything

The litigators who run the smoothest remote depositions are the most prepared. They have answered — in advance — every "what if" question:

  • What if the connection drops? → Reconnect within 10 minutes; no examination during outage
  • What if the witness's audio degrades? → Go off record; troubleshoot; do not continue on a bad record
  • What if opposing counsel introduces an exhibit improperly? → Object and request proper identification for the record
  • What if the reporter needs a break? → Call it; never continue over a reporter's request to pause

They Control the Record

The transcript is the lasting artifact. Experienced remote deposition practitioners are conscious of the record at every moment.

Good

"I am introducing what I am marking as Exhibit 7, an email dated June 3, 2022, from Michael Torres to the board of directors, produced at Bates numbers ABC-04217 through ABC-04219."

Avoid

"Can you look at this document?" [screen share, no Bates identification, no exhibit number stated]

What They Have Stopped Doing

  • Stopped using screen share for exhibits. Every experienced practitioner. The first time you run a deposition on a proper exhibit platform and see a document appear simultaneously for all participants in under three seconds, the screen share approach becomes unthinkable.
  • Stopped letting witnesses run their own tech. The witness who shows up with AirPods and a coffee shop Wi-Fi connection is avoidable with a single pre-deposition tech call.
  • Stopped skipping the opening protocol. The three-minute ritual of opening the record — identifying all participants, stating the platform and recording method, explaining the exhibit procedure — prevents most disputes that arise later about what the record actually says.

Appendix A: Pre-Deposition Stipulation Template

Adapt for your jurisdiction. Confirm with opposing counsel before use.

The parties, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Format. The deposition of [Witness Name] shall be conducted by videoconference via [Platform Name], in accordance with [FRCP Rule 30(b)(4) / applicable state rule].

2. Notice. All parties acknowledge receipt of the notice of deposition, including the identification of the remote platform and recording method.

3. Oath. The court reporter shall administer the oath to the witness via the videoconference platform. The parties stipulate that the oath so administered is valid notwithstanding the remote format, and waive any objection based solely on the method of oath administration.

4. Recording. The deposition shall be recorded by [stenographic means / audiovisual recording / both]. The recording shall be preserved by [court reporter / videographer / Party] and made available upon request.

5. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be introduced using [AgileLaw / exhibit platform]. Each exhibit shall be introduced by counsel stating the exhibit number, description, and any applicable Bates range. The court reporter shall maintain an exhibit log. The parties waive any objection to exhibits based solely on the remote method of introduction.

6. Objections. Objections shall be made in the form "Objection, [basis]." The witness shall not answer until directed by examining counsel or instructed by counsel to withhold the answer.

7. Technical problems. In the event of a material technical failure, the deposition shall go off the record. Parties will attempt to reconnect within [10/15] minutes. If reconnection is not possible, the deposition will be continued to a mutually agreeable date.

8. Confidentiality. Participants shall not record the deposition by any means other than those stated in paragraph 4. No participant other than parties of record, counsel of record, and the court reporter shall be present without advance notice to all parties.

9. Remote format. The parties waive any objection to the use of the remote format, including any objection based on the physical location of any participant, and stipulate that the deposition shall be treated for all purposes as if conducted in [applicable jurisdiction].

Appendix B: Witness Technology Preparation Sheet

Send to witnesses and their counsel 48 hours before the deposition.

Your upcoming deposition will be conducted by videoconference. Please review the following before the day of the deposition.

Technology you will need:

  • A laptop or desktop computer (preferred over mobile phone or tablet)
  • Headphones or a headset — not laptop speakers
  • A stable internet connection. Test your speed at speedtest.net. You need at least 5 Mbps download and 2 Mbps upload.
  • A wired Ethernet connection if possible. If not, be as close to your Wi-Fi router as possible.

Your environment:

  • Be in a private room with the door closed. No one else should be present unless your attorney is with you.
  • Good lighting in front of you — not a window behind you.
  • A quiet space with no loud background noise.

On the day of the deposition:

  • Close all other applications on your computer before joining the meeting.
  • Join the videoconference at least 10 minutes early. You will be placed in a waiting room and admitted before the deposition opens.
  • When a document is introduced, it will appear on your screen. You can scroll and zoom freely.
  • If you experience any technical problem, call [direct phone number] immediately.

Ground rules:

  • Listen to each question completely before answering.
  • If you hear "Objection," stop and wait — do not answer until instructed.
  • Take your time. If you need a break, say so.
  • Do not record the deposition by any means.

Appendix C: Technology Checklist

Item
Minimum
Recommended
Internet (download)
10 Mbps
25+ Mbps
Internet (upload)
5 Mbps
10+ Mbps
Connection type
Wi-Fi
Wired Ethernet
Computer
4-yr-old laptop, 8 GB RAM
3-yr-old laptop, 16 GB RAM
Microphone
USB headset
USB headset or desktop mic
Camera
Built-in 1080p
External USB webcam, eye level
Backup connection
Hotspot available
Hotspot tested
Exhibit platform
Dedicated tool (not screen share)
AgileLaw or equivalent
Second monitor
Optional
Recommended for long deps

Ready to put this into practice?

AgileLaw automates most of what's in this guide — exhibit upload, introduction, marking, and logging — so you can focus on the examination.